Prevalence of Ischemic Versus Hemorrhagic Stroke in Patients Taking Anti-Coagulation Therapy

Nasrullah Aamer1, Muhammad Nouman2, Shahid Hussain Memon3, Zaheer Hussain Memon4, Shaista Ahmed5, Hira Saeed Khan4

1Peoples University of Medical and Health Sciences Nawabshah, 2Indus Medical College, Tando Muhammad Khan, Pakistan, 3Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro Pakistan, 4Suleman Roshan Medical College, Tando Adam, Pakistan, 5Karachi Medical and Dental College, Karachi

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of ischemic versus hemorrhagic stroke in patients taking anti-coagulation therapy.
Methodology: This cross-sectional prospective study was conducted at medicine Departments of Peoples University of Medical & Health Sciences (PUMHS), for a period of 18 months from September 2021 to January 2023. All the patients taking anti-thrombotic therapy (warfarin, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, or apixaban) were included in this study and their baseline and clinical data were collected. Statistical package for the social sciences version (SPSS v. 26) was used for data entry and data analysis. Chi-square test/fisher’s exact and independent t-test test was used for determination of risk factors associated with hemorrhagic or ischemic strokes. A p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results: A total of 296 patients were enrolled for final analysis. The overall mean age, BMI, and duration of anticoagulation therapy was 62.14±8.44 years, 25.38±3.19 kg/m2, and 8.34±12.51 months. Among all study participants, 57.43% (n = 170) were taking NOACs while 42.56% (n = 126) were taking warfarin. The overall prevalence of stroke was 14.18% (n = 42) and among them hemorrhagic stroke was more common (57.14%, n = 27) than ischemic stroke (35.71%, n = 15). Patients taking NOACs were more likely to have hemorrhagic stroke as compared to ischemic stroke, 74.07% (n = 20/27) and 40.0% (n = 7), respectively, p value <0.001.
Conclusion: The risk of stroke is quite high in patients receiving anti-thrombotic therapies. Hemorrhagic stroke is higher in patients receiving NOACs
Keywords: Anti-thrombotic therapy, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, Pakistan

Anti-platelets such as aspirin, clopidogrel, and Anticoagulation therapy like warfarin, and novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are the drugs usually recommended in patients with atherosclerotic diseases such as coronary artery and cerebrovascular diseases, peripheral arterial disease (PAD), cardiac arrhythmias, valvular heart disease, and in patients underwent cardiac valve replacement1,2. Use of anticoagulants is not risk free and is associated with certain side effects which may vary from mild to life threatening (3). In a study conducted by Eek AK and colleagues have observed prevalence of adverse reaction after the use of oral anticoagulants was 0.62% (n = 409/65,000) (4). The side effects include, drug hypersensitivity, therapeutic failure, headache, hair loss, cognitive function decline, ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebral vascular accidents, or even death5. The most common site of bleeding is gastrointestinal tract while intracranial bleeding is least common but devastating and even lead to disability and death6. The overall risk of bleeding among anticoagulant users depends upon multiple factors such as dose of anticoagulant, underlying pathology, age, gender, duration of therapy, type of anticoagulation therapy, and comorbid conditions. In a previously published study, the risk of bleeding was observed around 7.2%7. It is observed that 10 times higher risk of bleeding among warfarin users during the first month of therapy8. While another study conducted by Noseworthy PA and colleagues9 have observed that patients using NOACs (Rivaroxaban, Apixaban, and Dabigatran) have lower risk of stroke and systemic embolism. Comparative data regarding ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke among patients using anticoagulation therapy is limited. Only few studies are published and majority of them are from international authors of developed countries. This study aims to fill the scientific gap present local level and to provide data regarding prevalence of ischemic and/or hemorrhagic stroke in patients using anticoagulation therapy due to any cause.

This was a prospective hospital-based observational study conducted in the Department of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, and Department of Cardiology, Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences (LUMHS), Hyderabad/Jamshoro for a period of 14 months from September 2022 to November 2023. Ethical approval was taken before commencement of this study and informed written consent was also sought from patient or their attendants before enrolment into this study. The inclusion criteria for this study were patients taking anticoagulation therapy such as warfarin or NOACs due to any underlying cause, age ranges between 25 years to 80 years, both male and female, and hospitalized for acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Patients had previous history of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, patients with congenital bleeding diathesis, pregnant women, patients receiving concomitant antiplatelet therapy, patient’s intolerant to anticoagulation therapy, and those who do not consent to participate. All the enrolled patients presented in aforementioned departments were examined and detailed history were taken at the time of admission. Patients were given standard care to all the patients according to the recent American guidelines. Diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke were made through history, physical examination, and confirmed through CT scan. Detail regarding dose, type, and duration of anticoagulation therapy were also collected. Baseline and clinical variables such as age, gender, area of residence, marital status, addiction habits (active cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption) body mass index (BMI), comorbid conditions (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia), and type of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke were collected. Statistical package for the social sciences version (SPSS v. 26) was used for data entry and data analysis. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical variables such as gender, BMI, area of residence, addiction habits, comorbid conditions, type and dose of anticoagulation therapy, and type of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. While mean and SD were calculated for continuous variables such as age and duration of anticoagulation therapy. Chi-square test/fisher’s exact test was used for determination of association between categorical variables and independent t-test was performed to determine the association between continuous variables. A p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

A total of 296 patients were enrolled for final analysis who were taking anticoagulation therapy. The overall mean age, BMI, and duration of anticoagulation therapy was 62.14±8.44 years, 25.38±3.19 kg/m2, and 8.34±12.51 months. `Majority of the patients (n = 213, 71.95%) belongs to age between ≥51-80 years. Males were more prevalent than females, 64.52% (n = 191) and 35.47% (n = 105), respectively. Among all study participants, current cigarette smokers were 35.81% (n = 106). In this study, the most common comorbid condition was presence of hypertension (37.5%, n = 111) followed by diabetes mellitus (26.31%, n = 78), and dyslipidemia (26.01%, n = 77). Table I. Among all 296 study participants, 57.43% (n = 170) were taking NOACs while 42.56% (n = 126) were taking warfarin. Graph 1 shows association between anticoagulation therapies with frequency of strokes. The overall prevalence of stroke was 14.18% (n = 42) and among them hemorrhagic stroke was more common (57.14%, n = 27) than ischemic stroke (35.71%, n = 15). Patients taking NOACs were more likely to have hemorrhagic stroke as compared to ischemic stroke, 74.07% (n = 20/27) and 40.0% (n = 7), respectively, p value <0.001.

Graph 1: Prevalence of Ischemic Vs Hemorrhagic Stroke among Patients Taking Anticoagulant Therapy

Table I: Baseline and Clinical Characteristics of Study Participants taking Anticoagulants

Variables

Overall

Frequency

Percentage

Age – years

Mean±SD

62.14±8.44

≥25 – 50

83

28.04

≥51 – 80

213

71.95

Gender

Male

191

64.52

Female

105

35.47

BMI - kg/m2

25.38±3.19

Duration of anticoagulation therapy - months

8.34±12.51

Area of residence

Urban

208

70.27

Rural

88

29.72

Marital Status

Single

27

9.12

Married

251

84.79

Widowed

12

4.05

Separated

6

2.02

Current cigarette smoker

106

35.81

Comorbid conditions

Hypertension

111

37.5

Diabetes mellitus

78

26.31

Dyslipidemia

77

26.01

Type of anticoagulation

Warfarin

126

42.56

NOACs

170

57.43

BMI = Body mass index, NOACs = Novel oral anticoagulants



Table 2 shows factors associated with ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Higher mean age 65.11±7.12 years and patients with diabetes mellitus (70.37%, n = 19) were significantly associated with hemorrhagic stroke while increased duration of anticoagulation therapy 11.09±4.62 months was associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke, p value <0.05.

Table II: Association between Baseline and Clinical Characteristics with Outcomes (N =296)

Variables

Ischemic stroke

Hemorrhagic stroke

P value

 

(N = 15)

(N = 27)

Age - years

Mean±SD

61.08±9.76

65.11±7.12

0.004*

 ≥25 - 50

4 (26.66)

2 (7.40)

0.001*

 ≥51 - 80

11 (73.33)

25 (92.59)

Gender

  Male

10 (66.66)

16 (59.25)

0.08

  Female

5 (33.33)

9 (33.33)

BMI - kg/m2

25.06±4.03

25.46±3.76

0.43

Duration of anticoagulation therapy - months

11.09±4.62

9.55±9.34

0.001*

Area of residence

  Urban

11 (73.33)

20 (74.07)

0.16

  Rural

4 (26.66)

7 (25.92)

Marital Status

  Single

1 (6.66)

2 (7.40)

0.98

  Married

12 (80.0)

24 (88.88)

  Widowed

2 (13.33)

0 (0)

  Separated

0 (0)

1 (3.70)

Current cigarette smoker

4 (26.66)

9 (33.33)

0.09

Comorbid conditions

  Hypertension

10 (66.66)

16 (59.25)

0.02*

  Diabetes mellitus

6 (40.0)

19 (70.37)

  Dyslipidemia

5 (33.33)

12 (44.44)

*p value <0.05 is statistically significant

BMI = Body mass index, NOACs = Novel oral anticoagulants

Cerebrovascular accidents are the leading causes of disability and deaths worldwide particularly in older patients with multiple comorbids such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia10,11. Besides these risk factors, patients who are taking anticoagulation therapy are also at high risk for development of CVA12,13. In a recently published randomized controlled trial included 42 studies and more than 300000 patients from 1995 to 2020 have shown that risk of intracranial bleed and hemorrhagic stroke significantly increased in patients taking antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy as compared to ischemic stroke (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.00-1.8614. The same findings were observed in our study in which we have observed that patients had significantly higher rates of hemorrhagic stroke using NOACs as compared to warfarin 74.07% (n = 20/27). On the other hand, our study also shows that ischemic stroke was common in patients taking warfarin. On the contrary, study conducted by Shpak M and colleagues 15 in 2018 have observed higher prevalence of ischemic strokes among patients receiving NOACs. Varied prevalence of strokes observed in different population. The reason behind this difference could be selection antithrombotic therapy, underlying risk factors, duration of therapy, as increased age, patients with multiple comorbid conditions and labile PT and INR are associated with increased prevalence pf stroke.
In our study we have also observed that Higher mean age 65.11±7.12 years and patients with diabetes mellitus (70.37%, n = 19) were significantly associated with hemorrhagic stroke while increased duration of anticoagulation therapy 11.09±4.62 months was associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke, p value <0.05. The same findings are observed in previously published studies16,18. Risk of intracranial bleeding also increases with type of anti-thrombotic drugs such as patients who were taking rivaroxaban poses highest risk of bleeding as compared to patients taking aspirin, dabigatran, or apixaban (RR 2.12; 95% CI 1.31-3.44)19. That is why choice of anti-thrombotic agent is necessary for patient’s safety and desired results. On the other hand, drug compliance also plays and important role in drug safety, prevent from poor outcome, and also complication free therapy20,21. For that, patients with non-adherence to drug should be excluded to determine the real–world experience of stroke among patients taking anti-thrombotic therapy. There are certain limitations in this study. Firstly, it would be beneficial to conduct a comparison between various types of NOACs to determine their respective prevalence rates of ischemic versus hemorrhagic strokes. Secondly, increasing the sample size by including multiple hospitals from various regions across Pakistan could enhance the generalizability of the findings. Lastly, exploring the association between the indication for anti-thrombotic therapy and the prevalence rates of ischemic versus hemorrhagic strokes could provide valuable insights into treatment strategies and patient outcomes.

The risk of stroke is quite high in patients receiving anti-thrombotic therapies. Hemorrhagic stroke is higher in patients receiving NOACs. Risk factors mentioned in our study leading to highest risk of stroke should be considered at the time of commencement of anti-thrombotic therapy and also, multi-center studies should be conducted in Pakistan to validate the findings this study.

  1. Wigle P, Hein B, Bernheisel CR. Anticoagulation: Updated Guidelines for Outpatient Management. Am Fam Physician. 2019;100(7):426-34.PMID: 31573167.
  2. Altiok E, Marx N. Oral Anticoagulation. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;115(46):776-83. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2018.0776
  3. Elango K, Javaid A, Khetarpal BK, Ramalingam S, Kolandaivel KP, Gunasekaran K, et al. The Effects of Warfarin and Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Systemic Vascular Calcification: A Review. Cells. 2021;10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10040773
  4. Eek AK, Strom BO, Bakkehoi G, Stenberg-Nilsen H. Anticoagulant-associated adverse drug reactions in 2013-15. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2018;138(12).
  5. Ghanima W. Adverse drug reactions upon use of new anticoagulants. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2018;138(12). https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.18.0566
  6. Geng Y, Meng C, Gao T, Zhang P, Wang Y. The efficacy and safety of out-hospital anticoagulation therapy with direct oral anticoagulant for COVID-19. Eur J Intern Med. 2023;115:160-3. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.ejim.2023.06.023
  7. Dreijer AR, Diepstraten J, Brouwer R, Croles FN, Kragten E, Leebeek FWG, et al. Risk of bleeding in hospitalized patients on anticoagulant therapy: Prevalence and potential risk factors. Eur J Intern Med. 2019;62:17-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2019.01.008
  8. Landefeld CS, Beyth RJ. Anticoagulant-related bleeding: clinical epidemiology, prediction, and prevention. Am J Med. 1993;95(3):315-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(93)90285-w
  9. Noseworthy PA, Yao X, Abraham NS, Sangaralingham LR, McBane RD, Shah ND. Direct Comparison of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban for Effectiveness and Safety in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. Chest. 2016;150(6):1302-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.07.013
  10. Khaku AS, Tadi P. Cerebrovascular Disease. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL) ineligible companies. Disclosure: Prasanna Tadi declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.2024. PMID: 28613677.
  11. Katan M, Luft A. Global Burden of Stroke. Semin Neurol. 2018;38(2):208-11. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1649503
  12. Azar AJ, Koudstaal PJ, Wintzen AR, van Bergen PF, Jonker JJ, Deckers JW. Risk of stroke during long-term anticoagulant therapy in patients after myocardial infarction. Ann Neurol. 1996;39(3):301-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410390306
  13. Shahpouri MM, Mousavi S, Khorvash F, Mousavi SM, Hoseini T. Anticoagulant therapy for ischemic stroke: A review of literature. J Res Med Sci. 2012;17(4):396-401. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc3526137/
  14. Shao QY, Wang ZJ, Ma XT, Lin XZ, Pan L, Zhou YJ. Stroke of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021;21(1):574. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02384-w
  15. Shpak M, Ramakrishnan A, Nadasdy Z, Cowperthwaite M, Fanale C. Higher Incidence of Ischemic Stroke in Patients Taking Novel Oral Anticoagulants. Stroke. 2018;49(12):2851-6. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.118.022636
  16. Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Analysis of pooled data from five randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Jul 11;154(13):1449-57. Erratum in: Arch Intern Med 1994 Oct 10;154(19):2254. PMID: 8018000.
  17. Rockson SG, Albers GW. Comparing the guidelines: anticoagulation therapy to optimize stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(6):929-35.
  18. Maggioni AP, Franzosi MG, Santoro E, White H, Van de Werf F, Tognoni G. The risk of stroke in patients with acute myocardial infarction after thrombolytic and antithrombotic treatment. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico II (GISSI-2), and The International Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199207023270101
  19. Wu T, Lv C, Wu L, Chen W, Lv M, Jiang S, et al. Risk of intracranial hemorrhage with direct oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Neurol. 2022;269(2):664-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10448-2
  20. Holthuis E, Smits E, Spentzouris G, Beier D, Enders D, Gini R, et al. Increased Risk of Stroke Due to Non-adherence and Non-persistence with Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs): Real-World Analyses Using a Nested Case-Control Study from The Netherlands, Italy and Germany. Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2022;9(4):597-607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-022-00317-3
  21. Ullah I, Ahmad F, Ahmad S, Hayat Y. Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Prevention Practices in Patients with Candidacy for Anticoagulation Therapy. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2015;27(3):669-72. PMID: 26721036.